Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1489620
 


 



Judicial Review and the Political Question Doctrine: Reviving the Federalist 'Rebuttable Presumption' Analysis


Robert J. Pushaw


Pepperdine University - School of Law

2002

North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 80, 2002

Abstract:     
Implementing Federalist theory, the Constitution established a presumption favoring judicial review, which could be rebutted only by a few constitutional provisions (such as those governing impeachment and appointments) that raised purely "political" questions. This "rebuttable presumption" approach held sway into the twentieth century.

Baker v. Carr replaced this Federalist political question doctrine with one that requires a prudential balancing of many vague factors. In practice, the Baker test has granted federal judges near absolute discretion, which has generally been exercised to decide constitutional issues that implicate sensitive political matters. Because the modem political question doctrine lacks legal coherence, both in theory and as applied, the Court should reintroduce the "rebuttable presumption" model in order to reach more legally principled and consistent results.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: Constitutional law, judicial review, political question doctrine, Baker v. Carr

JEL Classification: K39

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 16, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Pushaw, Robert J., Judicial Review and the Political Question Doctrine: Reviving the Federalist 'Rebuttable Presumption' Analysis (2002). North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 80, 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1489620

Contact Information

Robert J. Pushaw (Contact Author)
Pepperdine University - School of Law ( email )
24255 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90263
United States
(310) 506-6318 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 403
Downloads: 78
Download Rank: 183,905

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.250 seconds