Motivational Goal Bracketing
32 Pages Posted: 20 Oct 2009
Abstract
It is a puzzle why people often evaluate consequences of choices separately (narrow bracketing) rather than jointly (broad bracketing). We study the hypothesis that a present-biased individual, who faces two tasks, may bracket his goals narrowly for motivational reasons. Goals motivate because they serve as reference points that make substandard performance psychologically painful. A broad goal allows high performance in one task to compensate for low performance in the other. This partially insures against the risk of falling short of ones' goal(s), but creates incentives to shirk in one of the tasks. Narrow goals have a stronger motivational force and thus can be optimal. In particular, if one task outcome becomes known before working on the second task, narrow bracketing is always optimal.
Keywords: goals, multiple tasks, motivational bracketing, self-control, time inconsistency, psychology
JEL Classification: A12, C70, D91
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Vincent P. Crawford and Juanjuan Meng
-
Reference Points and Effort Provision
By Johannes Abeler, Armin Falk, ...
-
Reference Points and Effort Provision
By Johannes Abeler, Armin Falk, ...
-
Reference Points and Effort Provision
By Johannes Abeler, Armin Falk, ...
-
A Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in a Real Effort Competition
By David Gill and Victoria L. Prowse
-
A Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in a Real Effort Competition
By David Gill and Victoria L. Prowse
-
Fairness and Desert in Tournaments
By David Gill and Rebecca Stone
-
Binary Payment Schemes: Moral Hazard and Loss Aversion
By Fabian Herweg, Daniel Müller, ...
-
Is the Endowment Effect a Reference Effect?
By Ori Heffetz and John A. List