Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=149075
 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



Hiding with Words: Obfuscation, Avoidance, and Federal Jurisdiction Opinions


Laura E. Little


Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law


UCLA Law Review, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1998

Abstract:     
This article summarizes Professor Little's empirical study of linguistic devices appearing in the holdings of United States Supreme Court opinions. The linguistic devices scrutinized are those likely to obfuscate the meaning of communication. Comparing the holdings of federal jurisdiction opinions with those of "merits" decisions, Professor Little found that more obfuscatory devides appeared in the federal jurisdiction decisions. This finding supports federal jurisdiction scholars' view that Supreme Court Justices take license with jurisdiction rulings in order to disguise decisions on the merits of disputes, control the development of constitutional rights, or avoid difficult legal issues.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 86

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 10, 1999 ; Last revised: November 26, 2008

Suggested Citation

Little, Laura E., Hiding with Words: Obfuscation, Avoidance, and Federal Jurisdiction Opinions. UCLA Law Review, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1998. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=149075

Contact Information

Laura E. Little (Contact Author)
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law ( email )
1719 N. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States
215-204-8955 (Phone)
215-204-1185 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 619
Downloads: 58
Download Rank: 214,613
Citations:  3

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.266 seconds