Hiding with Words: Obfuscation, Avoidance, and Federal Jurisdiction Opinions
Laura E. Little
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law
UCLA Law Review, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1998
This article summarizes Professor Little's empirical study of linguistic devices appearing in the holdings of United States Supreme Court opinions. The linguistic devices scrutinized are those likely to obfuscate the meaning of communication. Comparing the holdings of federal jurisdiction opinions with those of "merits" decisions, Professor Little found that more obfuscatory devides appeared in the federal jurisdiction decisions. This finding supports federal jurisdiction scholars' view that Supreme Court Justices take license with jurisdiction rulings in order to disguise decisions on the merits of disputes, control the development of constitutional rights, or avoid difficult legal issues.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 86Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 10, 1999 ; Last revised: November 26, 2008
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.426 seconds