Self-Defense, Moral Acceptability, and Compensation
Michael Louis Corrado
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law
October 19, 2009
American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 47, p. 91, 2010
This paper is a response to Reid Fontaine's Attack on Self-Defense, published in ACLR. I argue against his hybrid theory of self-defense, and argue generally for a subjective view of self-defense. I also argue that what distinguishes the justification of actual self-defense from the justification of mistaken self-defense is - or, rather, should be - the requirement of compensation in the latter case.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6
Keywords: self-defense, justification and excuseAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 20, 2009 ; Last revised: July 14, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.672 seconds