|
||||
|
||||
Do Bonuses Enhance Sales Productivity? A Dynamic Structural Analysis of Bonus-Based Compensation PlansDoug Chungaffiliation not provided to SSRN Thomas J. SteenburghUniversity of Virginia - Darden Graduate School of Business K. SudhirYale University - Cowles Foundation; Yale School of Managemnet October 18, 2010 Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 1491283 Abstract: We estimate a dynamic structural model of sales force response to a bonus based compensation plan. The paper has two main methodological innovations: First, we implement empirically the method proposed by Arcidiacono and Miller (2010) to accommodate unobserved latent class heterogeneity with a computationally light two-step estimator. Second, the bonus setting helps estimate discount factors in a dynamic structural model using field data. This is because, quarterly and annual bonuses help generate the instruments necessary to identify both discount factors in a hyperbolic discounting model. Substantively, the paper sheds insights on how different elements of the compensation plan enhance productivity. We find clear evidence that: (1) bonuses enhance productivity; (2) overachievement commissions help sustain the high productivity of the best performers even after attaining quotas; and (3) sales people exhibit present bias consistent with hyperbolic discounting. Given such present bias, frequent quarterly bonuses tied to high demand end-of-quarter months, serve as pacers to keep the sales force on track to achieve their annual sales quotas.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50 Keywords: Sales Force Compensation, Productivity, Structural Dynamic Model JEL Classification: L23, L14 working papers seriesDate posted: October 19, 2009 ; Last revised: November 23, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.390 seconds