Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1491767
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



The Quiet Metamorphosis: How Derivatives Changed the 'Business of Banking'


Saule T. Omarova


Cornell Law School


University Miami Law Review, Vol. 63, p. 1041, 2009
UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1491767

Abstract:     
This Article uncovers and analyzes an important part of our recent regulatory history, one that provides a key to understanding some of the deeper, hidden causes of the recent financial crisis. It offers an in-depth analysis of an extensive body of regulatory decisions - interpretive letters issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the primary regulator of federally chartered banks - that constitute the primary source of the U.S. commercial banks’ legal authority to trade and deal in a wide range of derivative instruments. In these letters, issued between the mid-1980s and the end of 2008, the OCC interpreted an ambiguously phrased central clause in the National Bank Act of 1863, which sets forth activities permissible for national banks, as authorizing derivatives transactions as part of the “business of banking.”

While legal scholars have thoroughly examined the evolution of the statutory concept of the “business of banking” in the context of banks’ attempts to conduct securities, insurance, or real estate activities, to date, the far-reaching regulatory implications of the OCC’s interpretive efforts in the derivatives area have gone largely unnoticed. This Article develops a typology of methods the OCC used to interpret the statutory language as permitting banks to engage in an increasingly complex set of derivatives transactions. It argues that, in the course of issuing these interpretations, the OCC gradually formulated an excessively broad definition of the key statutory concept of the “business of banking” as encompassing all types of financial intermediation and dealing in all forms of financial risk. Through the seemingly routine and often non-transparent administrative actions, the agency effectively enabled large U.S. commercial banks to transform themselves from the traditionally conservative deposit-taking and lending institutions into a new breed of financial “super-intermediaries,” or wholesale dealers in pure financial risk. By indirectly removing most of the restrictions on activities of commercial banks, the OCC’s interpretive efforts had an ironic effect of prolonging the life of an obsolete statute and potentially impeding legislative reforms necessary to bring the regulatory framework in line with the changing business and risk profile of modern financial institutions. Understanding this process and its outcomes provides a more nuanced context for the ongoing debate on the future of financial sector regulation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 70

Keywords: business of banking, bank powers, national bank, bank regulation, financial regulation, derivatives, systemic risk, OCC, Comptroller of the Currency, interpretive letter, agency interpretation, regulatory reform, financial intermediation

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 21, 2009 ; Last revised: February 20, 2010

Suggested Citation

Omarova, Saule T., The Quiet Metamorphosis: How Derivatives Changed the 'Business of Banking'. University Miami Law Review, Vol. 63, p. 1041, 2009; UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1491767. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1491767

Contact Information

Saule T. Omarova (Contact Author)
Cornell Law School ( email )
524 College Ave
Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,630
Downloads: 678
Download Rank: 20,872
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds