|
||||
|
||||
A Critique of Evans and Wright’s Study of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act
Adam J. Levitin Georgetown University - Law Center October 22, 2009 Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 1492471 Georgetown Business, Economics and Regulatory Policy Working Paper No. 1492471 Abstract: Fictitious scare statistics have featured prominently in recent debates over consumer credit policy. The latest example is David Evans and Joshua Wright’s statistical claims about the impact of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act on the cost and availability of consumer credit and economic growth. This brief critique shows that the claims in Evans and Wright's study - funded by the American Bankers Association - are either based on exceptionally flawed methodology or on wholesale conjecture.
Keywords: Consumer Financial Protection Agency, consumer credit Working Paper SeriesDate posted: October 21, 2009 ; Last revised: December 11, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.188 seconds.