|
||||
|
||||
A Critique of Evans and Wright’s Study of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act
Adam J. Levitin Georgetown University - Law Center; American Bankruptcy Institute October 22, 2009 Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 1492471 Georgetown Business, Economics and Regulatory Policy Working Paper No. 1492471 Abstract: Fictitious scare statistics have featured prominently in recent debates over consumer credit policy. The latest example is David Evans and Joshua Wright’s statistical claims about the impact of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act on the cost and availability of consumer credit and economic growth. This brief critique shows that the claims in Evans and Wright's study - funded by the American Bankers Association - are either based exceptionally flawed methodology or wholesale conjecture.
Keywords: Consumer Financial Protection Agency, consumer credit Working Paper SeriesDate posted: October 21, 2009 ; Last revised: November 17, 2009Suggested Citation |
|
||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.109 seconds.