Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1492471
 
 

Footnotes (26)



 


 



A Critique of Evans and Wright’s Study of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act


Adam J. Levitin


Georgetown University Law Center

October 22, 2009

Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 1492471
Georgetown Business, Economics and Regulatory Policy Working Paper No. 1492471

Abstract:     
Fictitious scare statistics have featured prominently in recent debates over consumer credit policy. The latest example is David Evans and Joshua Wright’s statistical claims about the impact of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act on the cost and availability of consumer credit and economic growth. This brief critique shows that the claims in Evans and Wright's study - funded by the American Bankers Association - are either based on exceptionally flawed methodology or on wholesale conjecture.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: Consumer Financial Protection Agency, consumer credit

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 21, 2009 ; Last revised: December 11, 2009

Suggested Citation

Levitin, Adam J., A Critique of Evans and Wright’s Study of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act (October 22, 2009). Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 1492471. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1492471 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1492471

Contact Information

Adam J. Levitin (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,090
Downloads: 320
Download Rank: 52,093
Footnotes:  26

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.844 seconds