Abstract

 


 



The Monument and the Message: Pragmatism and Principle in Establishment Clause Ten Commandments Litigation


Lael Daniel Weinberger


Franklin Adams and Company, LLC; Northern Illinois University

October 28, 2009

Texas Wesleyan Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, p. 393, 2008

Abstract:     
This article examines the standard approach taken by litigators defending public Decalogue displays and suggests that there is a theological problem raised by this approach. It is argued that the common approach taken by those who defend public Ten Commandments displays itself can devalue the Commandments and the principles that they embody. After identifying and exploring the problem, this article concludes by suggesting alternate legal approaches for the theologically self-conscious practitioner.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: Establishment Clause, Ten Commandments displays, theology, Van Orden, McCreary

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 29, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Weinberger, Lael Daniel, The Monument and the Message: Pragmatism and Principle in Establishment Clause Ten Commandments Litigation (October 28, 2009). Texas Wesleyan Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, p. 393, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1495903

Contact Information

Lael Daniel Weinberger (Contact Author)
Franklin Adams and Company, LLC ( email )
Sycamore, IL 60178
United States
HOME PAGE: http://about.me/laelweinberger
Northern Illinois University ( email )
Chicago, IL 60625-4699
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 177
Downloads: 24

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.407 seconds