Federalism and Insider Trading
Larry E. Ribstein (Deceased)
University of Illinois College of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 6, Pp. 123, 1998
In United States v. O'Hagan, the Supreme Court held that a lawyer's misappropriation of client information was fraud connected with his subsequent securities transactions and therefore actionable under section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This article argues that the decision makes sense only if federal law should protect property rights in information. State law, however, offers better-developed legal rules regarding property rights. Because of state law's greater potential to benefit from jurisdictional competition and legal evolution, state courts and legislators are more likely than federal lawmakers to devise efficient legal rules for protecting private information.
Date posted: May 17, 1999
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.422 seconds