Federalism and Insider Trading

Larry E. Ribstein (Deceased)

University of Illinois College of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center

Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 6, Pp. 123, 1998

In United States v. O'Hagan, the Supreme Court held that a lawyer's misappropriation of client information was fraud connected with his subsequent securities transactions and therefore actionable under section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This article argues that the decision makes sense only if federal law should protect property rights in information. State law, however, offers better-developed legal rules regarding property rights. Because of state law's greater potential to benefit from jurisdictional competition and legal evolution, state courts and legislators are more likely than federal lawmakers to devise efficient legal rules for protecting private information.

Not Available For Download

Date posted: May 17, 1999  

Suggested Citation

Ribstein (Deceased), Larry E., Federalism and Insider Trading. Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 6, Pp. 123, 1998. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=149615

Contact Information

Larry Edward Ribstein (Deceased) (Contact Author)
University of Illinois College of Law ( email )
504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States
217-244-9881 (Phone)
217-244-1478 (Fax)

PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
2048 Analysis Drive
Suite A
Bozeman, MT 59718
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,029

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds