|
||||
|
||||
Opitmal Antitrust Enforcement: Competitor Suits, Entry, and Post-Entry Competition
Abraham L. Wickelgren Northwestern University - School of Law Warren F. Schwartz Georgetown University Law Center October, 29 2009 Abstract: We consider the effect of competitor suits in a model in which an incumbent can take an action that deters the entry of a rival. The option to sue the incumbent can provide a subsidy for entry which can maintain competition even when the incumbent takes this action. Liability for the entrant’s lost profits, however, can soften post-entry competition. If the incumbent’s action is efficient, e.g. it increases the rival’s costs (but does not reduce the incumbent’s costs), then competitor suits (even with maximal antirust liability) cannot deter the incumbent from increasing the rival’s costs by at least a small amount. Thus, the paper suggests that government suits are preferable for inefficient actions while competitor suits are preferable for efficient actions that deter efficient entry. Working Paper Series Date posted: October 29, 2009 ; Last revised: October 29, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.093 seconds.