Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1497062
 
 

References (177)



 


 



Who Has 'The Right Stuff'? Educational Elites, Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change in China


Charles E. Eesley


Stanford University

June 30, 2011


Abstract:     
Our understanding of the connection between institutions and entrepreneurship is limited. Through their impact on barriers to entry and to growth in entrepreneurship, institutions will influence the types of individuals (specifically their level of human capital) who choose to engage in entrepreneurial activities. This paper shows that when barriers to the growth of entrepreneurial firms are reduced, individuals with higher human capital become entrepreneurs. By exploiting a natural experiment - embodied in the 1999 Chinese constitutional amendment - it is possible to implement a differences-in-differences approach to analyze the causal impact of institutional change on entrepreneurship. Unique data were collected through survey responses from 2,966 alumni who graduated from a leading technical university in China between 1947 and 2007. The results show that the greatest increase in the transition to entrepreneurship was generated by individuals belonging to the top quartiles of a human capital distribution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: entrepreneurship, institutional theory, China, human capital

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 31, 2009 ; Last revised: July 13, 2011

Suggested Citation

Eesley, Charles E., Who Has 'The Right Stuff'? Educational Elites, Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change in China (June 30, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1497062 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1497062

Contact Information

Charles E. Eesley (Contact Author)
Stanford University ( email )
473 Via Ortega
Stanford, CA 94305-9025
United States
(740) 236-4653 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.stanford.edu/~cee
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,095
Downloads: 284
Download Rank: 61,159
References:  177
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.265 seconds