Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (103)



 


 



Vertical Comparative Law Methods: Tools for Conceptualising the International Rule of Law


Aleksandar Momirov


Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Law

Andria Naude Fourie


Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Law

November 2, 2009

Erasmus Law Review, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2009

Abstract:     
International institutions are increasingly engaged in the exercise of public power – traditionally exercised by states – that might adversely affect individuals. Consequently, calls have arisen for checks and balances in order to provide affected individuals with adequate avenues for recourse and redress. Developing the ‘rule of law’ concept at the international level is one way in which this issue has been addressed, although only to a limited extent. This article explores the potential of comparative law methodology as a means to further this conceptualisation. It is argued that ‘vertical, bottom-up’ comparative law methods (as expounded by this article) can assist lawyers inspired by certain concepts within national legal systems (such as the rule of law) to apply these concepts – or the ideas behind them – at the international level. Furthermore, it is argued that employing comparative law methodology in this manner is increasingly justified by the emergence of a ‘common zone of impact’ – i.e., the area of overlap between national and international law, where individuals are adversely affected by the exercise of public power by states and international institutions alike. The authors propose a comparative law typology and discuss what risks might typically be involved in employing comparative law methods in general, as well as ways in which these risks could potentially be mitigated. Specifically, the article sets out a particular vertical, bottom-up comparative law method, as employed in the context of two separate doctoral research projects, both focusing on ways to enhance the accountability of international institutions: one in the context of international territorial administrations, and the other in the context of the World Bank and its Inspection Panel.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: comparative law methodology, international rule of law, World Bank Inspection Panel, international territorial administrations

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 2, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Momirov, Aleksandar and Naude Fourie, Andria, Vertical Comparative Law Methods: Tools for Conceptualising the International Rule of Law (November 2, 2009). Erasmus Law Review, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1498439

Contact Information

Aleksandar Momirov
Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Law ( email )
3000 DR Rotterdam
Netherlands
Andria Naude Fourie (Contact Author)
Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Law ( email )
3000 DR Rotterdam
Netherlands
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 837
Downloads: 177
Download Rank: 84,197
Footnotes:  103

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.390 seconds