Footnotes (13)



Construction, Development and Revelopment

Richard Stith

Valparaiso University School of Law


Life and Learning, Vol. 17, p. 243, 2007

If a claim that appears utterly convincing to the speaker is treated as absurd by others, the speaker is likely to think those others willfully perverse. But perhaps those others simply fail to grasp some background truth that the speaker has assumed to be obvious. Rectification of their mistake can then provide a basis for unexpected agreement and for isolating those respondents who are in fact deeply hostile to the speaker’s claim. This Article suggests that many of our fellow citizens find the pro-life argument against lethal embryo research to be absurd simply because they mistakenly treat gestation as a process of construction rather than as a process of development. Only an isolated segment of those who favor such research may have abandoned our traditional shared belief in human equality and dignity. The contrast between construction and development is also used to illuminate our disagreements over abortion and euthanasia.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: Nature, Embryo, Abortion, Euthanasia, Development, Ontology

JEL Classification: B30, B31, D63, D64, H41, J17, J18, K1, K19, K39

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: November 3, 2009 ; Last revised: March 13, 2012

Suggested Citation

Stith, Richard, Construction, Development and Revelopment (2007). Life and Learning, Vol. 17, p. 243, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1498593

Contact Information

Richard T. Stith (Contact Author)
Valparaiso University School of Law ( email )
656 S. Greenwich St.
Valparaiso, IN 46383-6493
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 391
Downloads: 38
Footnotes:  13

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.234 seconds