Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (41)



 


 



The Indivisible Constitution


Kermit Roosevelt III


University of Pennsylvania Law School

April 16, 2009

Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 25, Pg. 321, 2009
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 09-33

Abstract:     
In The Invisible Constitution, Laurence Tribe argues that many of our most deeply-held constitutional convictions are not to be found in the words of the Constitution itself. They are, instead, part of what he calls the invisible Constitution. This review essay argues that although that claim is true, it is not worth spending a book on. Moreover, its very truth-the fact that certain “invisible” constitutional propositions are as central and well-established as textual ones-undermines the value of treating the “invisible” Constitution as a qualitatively different entity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: The Invisible Constitution, Laurence Tribe, constitutional doctrine, interpretation and theory, beliefs and convictions, popular constitutionalism

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 3, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Roosevelt, Kermit, The Indivisible Constitution (April 16, 2009). Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 25, Pg. 321, 2009; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 09-33. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1498636

Contact Information

Kermit Roosevelt III (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215.746.8775 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 510
Downloads: 161
Download Rank: 91,734
Footnotes:  41

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.469 seconds