Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1498704
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (178)



 


 



Death-Worthiness and Prosecutorial Discretion in Capital Case Charging


Jules Epstein


Widener University - School of Law

October 28, 2009

Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review, Vol. 19, p. 389, 2010
Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-39

Abstract:     
Any attempt to assess the merits of a prosecutorial ‘selection’ scheme in capital-eligible homicide cases must have an appropriate metric. Scholarship to date has screened such discretionary scheme for racial and intra-state geographic disparities and found recurring problems in each area, with race (often race of victim) standing out in some jurisdictions as a dispositive factor in which defendant must face the death penalty at trial. If one assumes that a well-designed capital charging process can reduce if not eliminate such disparities, a metric for judging the success of prosecutorial charging schemes is still needed. This paper proposes that metric to be “death-worthiness,” a standard derived from the Court’s repeated insistence that the death penalty be reserved for the ‘worst of the worst,’ a standard that examines not only the crime and the negatives in the background of the accused but also all mitigating factors.

Even if a prosecutor’s office were to embrace this metric, and conduct pre-trial reviews of defense mitigation evidence to screen out those not ‘worthy’ of death, three barriers stand in the way of successful implementation of this standard. Counsel often fail to develop mitigation evidence, either due to ineffectiveness or a lack of resources. A defendant’s youth may compromise his/her willingness and ability to assist in the mitigation process, and where youth stands as a barrier to expressing remorse may unjustifiably leave a particular defendant in the death-worthy cohort. Finally, the power of victim survivor constituencies, as when the victim is a police officer killed in the line of duty, may bar a well-intentioned prosecutor from declining to seek death even where the individual defendant is not death-worthy. The result will be an over-inclusive charging process in capital cases; and given the variability of juror response (and the persistence of race-based judgments in jury deliberations), the result will ensure that capital punishment is visited upon some who are not, by any measure, “death worthy.”

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Keywords: capital cases, death penalty, capital punishment, prosecutorial discretion, homicide, sentencing

JEL Classification: K14, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 3, 2009 ; Last revised: July 30, 2010

Suggested Citation

Epstein, Jules, Death-Worthiness and Prosecutorial Discretion in Capital Case Charging (October 28, 2009). Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review, Vol. 19, p. 389, 2010; Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-39. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1498704

Contact Information

Jules Epstein (Contact Author)
Widener University - School of Law ( email )
4601 Concord Pike
P.O. Box 7286
Wilmington, DE 19803-0474
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 874
Downloads: 103
Download Rank: 152,259
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  178

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.594 seconds