Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1498754
 
 

Footnotes (25)



 


 



Judicial Review and Judicial Duty: The Original Understanding


Nelson Lund


George Mason University School of Law

November 2, 2009

Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 169-182, 2009
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09-55

Abstract:     
What we call “judicial review” was not established in Marbury v. Madison, or by American courts. It had existed in English and then American law for centuries, not as some kind of peculiar power but rather as a corollary of the judicial duty to decide cases according to the law of the land. While that duty sometimes required judicial courage in the face of political threats, this was not its most difficult or pervasive demand. The real challenge was the requirement that judges purge their decision-making of the influence of their own wills, which required them to set aside their own views about natural law, God’s will, sound policy, and even justice itself.

Phillip Hamburger’s Law and Judicial Duty advances and defends these claims with subtlety and detailed evidence. He carries his historical study up through the end of the eighteenth century, and thus has little to say about subsequent changes in the understanding of judicial review and judicial duty. But there are obvious implications for our contemporary debates about the proper role of judges and about the distinction between law and politics. This review touches on those debates, and suggests that a broadened political role for the federal judiciary may have been more clearly foreseeable than the leading proponents of our Constitution thought it wise to acknowledge during the ratification debates.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: Barack Obama, Congress, constitutionality, Dr. Bonham’s case, Federalist Papers, John Marshall, Michael Seidman, Rule of Law, Sonia Sotomayor, Supreme Court, Thomas Jefferson, unconstitutional

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 3, 2009 ; Last revised: April 10, 2014

Suggested Citation

Lund, Nelson, Judicial Review and Judicial Duty: The Original Understanding (November 2, 2009). Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 169-182, 2009; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09-55. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1498754

Contact Information

Nelson Robert Lund (Contact Author)
George Mason University School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-8045 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 973
Downloads: 206
Download Rank: 81,728
Footnotes:  25

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.453 seconds