Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1500049
 
 

Footnotes (209)



 


 



Sliding Towards Educational Outcomes: A New Remedy for Education Lawsuits in a Post-NCLB World


Christopher A. Suarez


Yale University - Law School

November 4, 2009

Michigan Journal of Race & Law, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2010

Abstract:     
Sheff v. O’Neill ushered in a new wave of education reform litigation that will challenge the constitutionality of de facto segregation under state education clauses, but its remedy has been inadequate. This Article proposes a new desegregation remedy - the sliding scale remedy - to address socioeconomic isolation in this unique constitutional context. The remedy employs varying degrees of equity power depending on students’ academic outcomes. It balances concerns over local control and separation of powers with the court’s need to effectuate rights, establishes a clear remedial principle, and ensures that states and school districts focus on students as they implement remedies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: education litigation, desegregation, school funding remedies, socioeconomic integration

JEL Classification: K10, K19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 4, 2009 ; Last revised: November 27, 2009

Suggested Citation

Suarez, Christopher A., Sliding Towards Educational Outcomes: A New Remedy for Education Lawsuits in a Post-NCLB World (November 4, 2009). Michigan Journal of Race & Law, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1500049

Contact Information

Christopher Alan Suarez (Contact Author)
Yale University - Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 311
Downloads: 38
Footnotes:  209

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds