Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1500050
 
 

Footnotes (445)



 


 



Patent Law and the Two Cultures


Peter Lee


University of California, Davis - School of Law

February 3, 2010

Yale Law Journal, Vol. 120, 2010
UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 206

Abstract:     
A half century ago, author and physicist C.P. Snow warned of a “gulf of mutual incomprehension” between the liberal arts and sciences. Snow’s “Two Cultures” thesis is particularly relevant to patent law, a realm where law and science intersect. Drawing on Snow’s framework, this Article addresses challenges that arise when lay judges must engage, understand, and ultimately pass judgment on complex technologies. It first argues that technological subject matter imposes significant cognitive burdens on generalist judges. It then explores the “cognitive miser” model whereby lay persons adopt heuristics and defer to expertise to limit their engagement with technology. Drawing from this psychological model, this Article then explores the unique role of formalism in patent doctrine. Advancing an information cost theory of Federal Circuit jurisprudence, this Article argues that formalistic patent doctrine mitigates the degree to which judges must engage technological subject matter. Formalism truncates difficult technical inquiries, thus helping to mediate the intersection of law and science.

The Article then identifies a countervailing trend in recent Supreme Court patent decisions. It is well-established that the Court has substantively narrowed patent rights. Less appreciated, however, is the Court’s systematic preference for contextually-sensitive, holistic standards over inquiry-truncating, formalistic rules. This so-called “holistic turn” promises to increase the degree to which lay judges must engage technologically complex subject matter. To address resulting cognitive burdens, this Article offers prescriptions for blending the economizing virtues of rules with the flexibility and contextual sensitivity of standards. It concludes by exploring the cultural differences of the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court as well as their implications for patent doctrine.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 82

Keywords: patents, culture, Two Cultures, STS, psychology, Federal Circuit, Supreme Court, formalism, holism, deference, expertise, judges

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 4, 2009 ; Last revised: November 6, 2010

Suggested Citation

Lee, Peter, Patent Law and the Two Cultures (February 3, 2010). Yale Law Journal, Vol. 120, 2010; UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 206. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1500050

Contact Information

Peter Lee (Contact Author)
University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )
Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA 95616-5201
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,839
Downloads: 240
Download Rank: 69,787
Footnotes:  445

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.375 seconds