Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1500146
 
 

References (64)



 


 



Independent Evaluations of Clinical Legal Education Programs: Appropriate Objectives and Processes in an Australian Setting


Adrian Evans


Monash University - Faculty of Law

Ross L. Hyams


Monash University - Faculty of Law


Griffith Law Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, p. 52, 2008
Monash University Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-22

Abstract:     
While some major Australian law schools remain in what can only be described as clinical oblivion, 20 of our 29 law schools describe themselves as having clinical programs of one variety or another. This number signifies that the majority of Australian law deans now believe that some sort of clinical program is important to the educational and even social objectives of their schools. At its heart, it is argued, clinical legal education is simply the best way to teach normative law and the skills of normative analysis and to instill the sense of professionalism in students which a sceptical client community increasingly considers essential in its lawyers. But nothing is taken for granted in education, and clinical programs must periodically evaluate their performance in the same way as other programs, particularly when the prize could be greater overall engagement from the new federal government in innovative tertiary legal education. Periodic reviews by law schools of all aspects of their legal education mix are a reality, and their cyclical re-occurrence provides ongoing opportunity to improve the integration of conventional and clinical law teaching. Clinical educators need to be prepared for the cyclical review process, not because reviews can help to sustain their program but because such reviews provide opportunities to entrench the sustainability of legal education itself. This article is about the need for clinicians to be effectively prepared for independent, external reviews of law school clinical programs. It identifies what a clinical review should examine and what process is best adopted by such an evaluation in an Australian legal education setting, in order to maximize the prospects for workable and integrated clinical-legal education.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: Clinical Legal Education, pedagogy, Law School, Faculty of Law

JEL Classification: K00, K4, K40, K49

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 5, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Evans, Adrian and Hyams, Ross L., Independent Evaluations of Clinical Legal Education Programs: Appropriate Objectives and Processes in an Australian Setting. Griffith Law Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, p. 52, 2008; Monash University Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-22. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1500146

Contact Information

Adrian Evans (Contact Author)
Monash University - Faculty of Law ( email )
Wellington Road
Clayton, Victoria 3800
Australia
Ross L. Hyams
Monash University - Faculty of Law ( email )
Wellington Road
Clayton, Victoria 3800
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 369
Downloads: 61
Download Rank: 212,776
References:  64

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.469 seconds