|
||||
|
||||
The European Defense Procurement Directive: An American Perspective
Christopher R. Yukins George Washington University - Law School The Government Contractor, Vol. 51, No. 41, November 2009 GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 480 GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 480 Abstract: On August 21, the new European directive on defense and security procurement, Directive 2009/81/EC, entered into force. See, e.g.,EU Adopts New Defense and Security Procurement Directive, 6 IGC ¶ 65. Previously, most European defense procurement was considered exempt from the European procurement directives that have harmonized procurement, with greater transparency and competition, across Europe. Under the new defense directive, all but the most sensitive defense and security procurements in Europe will have to be conducted under rules consistent with the new directive. From an American vantage point, however, it is not yet clear how the new directive will be implemented. If the defense directive merely brings new competition and transparency to the European procurement markets, the directive will be a welcome improvement in what was traditionally a closed and uncompetitive market. But if, in practice, the directive is used as an excuse to discriminate against U.S. exporters - or if it is perceived as a tool of discrimination - the directive threatens to trigger serious trade frictions in the transatlantic defense markets.
Keywords: public procurement, international trade, government contracts, international public procurement, European defense directive, transatlantic defense JEL Classifications: H57, K33, F13, F14, H57 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: November 11, 2009 ; Last revised: November 11, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo7b in 0.203 seconds.