|
||||
|
||||
The Commitment Effect versus Information Effect of Disclosure - Evidence from Smaller Reporting CompaniesLin ChengThe University of Arizona - Eller College of Management Scott LiaoUniversity of Toronto - Rotman School of Management Haiwen ZhangOhio State University (OSU) - Department of Accounting & Management Information Systems December 15, 2010 Abstract: We examine the commitment effect provided by mandatory disclosure and the information effect of voluntary disclosure on market illiquidity by exploring a regulatory change that allows smaller reporting companies to reduce the disclosure of certain information in their SEC filings. This regime change allows us to separate the commitment effect provided by mandatory disclosure from the information effect of voluntary disclosure. We find that firms eligible to reduce their disclosure, but voluntarily maintain their disclosure level experience an increase in market illiquidity. We also find that the increase in illiquidity is more pronounced for firms with higher agency costs. These findings suggest that mandatory disclosure serves as a credible commitment mechanism and that losing such commitment by disclosure deregulation is costly in the absence of a loss of information. Our study suggests that while voluntary disclosure is effective in reducing information asymmetry, it cannot replace mandatory disclosure in addressing information problems.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46 Keywords: Disclosure Regulation, Mandatory Disclosure, Commitment working papers seriesDate posted: November 9, 2009 ; Last revised: December 8, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.907 seconds