Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1503572
 
 

Footnotes (192)



 


 



The Multi-Staged Process of Judicial Review: Facial and As-Applied Constitutional Challenges to Legislation Before the U.S. Supreme Court


Stefanie A. Lindquist


University of Texas at Austin - School of Law

Pamela C. Corley


Vanderbilt University

November 10, 2009

U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 163
U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 176

Abstract:     
The Supreme Court's decision to invalidate a legislative enactment involves both the choice to strike as well as the choice whether to invalidate the statute on its face or as applied. Both choices implicate the possibility of counteraction by the legislature. In this paper, we evaluate the justices' choices to invalidate a state or federal enactment on its face or as applied using a Heckman probit technique, and find that the justices are responsive to both Congressional preferences over the substance of the challenged enactment, as well as the Court's ideological position relative to the two chambers of Congress. These findings suggest that the Court's exercise of judicial review is significantly influenced by Congress, both as to the choice to strike as well as to the method of constitutional enforcement.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 11, 2009 ; Last revised: November 1, 2010

Suggested Citation

Lindquist, Stefanie A. and Corley, Pamela C., The Multi-Staged Process of Judicial Review: Facial and As-Applied Constitutional Challenges to Legislation Before the U.S. Supreme Court (November 10, 2009). U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 163; U of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 176. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1503572 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1503572

Contact Information

Stefanie A. Lindquist (Contact Author)
University of Texas at Austin - School of Law ( email )
727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
512-232-1319 (Phone)
Pamela C. Corley
Vanderbilt University ( email )
Nashville, TN 37240
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,245
Downloads: 163
Download Rank: 110,410
Footnotes:  192

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.297 seconds