Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1503972
 
 

Footnotes (212)



 


 



Denying Choice of Forum: An Interference by the Massachusetts Trial Court with Domestic Violence Victims’ Rights and Safety


Margaret B. Drew


UMass School of Law

Marilu E. Gresens


University of Cincinnati - College of Law

November 15, 2009

Suffolk University Law Review, Vol. 43, 2010
U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 09-36

Abstract:     
Petitions for protection from abuse, often referred to as civil protection orders or restraining orders, are governed in Massachusetts by G.L. 209A. Massachusetts has been in the forefront of many civil protections for victims, including the provision of a timely, same day hearing and other accommodations that ease the burden on petitioners in need of an immediate remedy. The jurisdictional and venue provisions of chapter 209A permit a petitioner to file for protection in either the district, Boston municipal, superior or probate and family court departments of the Massachusetts Trial Court. The history of the jurisdiction and venue provisions of the statute reflects a thoughtful and effective process crafted by the Massachusetts legislature. The provisions permit a petitioner to file in the most geographically convenient court that is located within the petitioner’s county of residence. However, in May, 2009, the Norfolk Probate and Family Court became host to a pilot program implemented by the Massachusetts Trial Court. The pilot permits the probate and family court (“family court”) to initiate interdepartmental transfer of 209A petitions from the district courts to the family court, either upon motion of a party or sua sponte, when there are related matters pending between the parties in the family court.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: civil protection orders, domestic violence, victims' rights

JEL Classification: K39, K40, K49

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 12, 2009 ; Last revised: October 30, 2012

Suggested Citation

Drew, Margaret B. and Gresens, Marilu E., Denying Choice of Forum: An Interference by the Massachusetts Trial Court with Domestic Violence Victims’ Rights and Safety (November 15, 2009). Suffolk University Law Review, Vol. 43, 2010; U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 09-36. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1503972

Contact Information

Margaret Bell Drew (Contact Author)
UMass School of Law ( email )
333 Faunce Corner Road
North Dartmouth, MA 02747
United States
508-985-1126 (Phone)
Marilu E. Gresens
University of Cincinnati - College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210040
Cincinnati, OH 45221-0040
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 880
Downloads: 72
Download Rank: 198,764
Footnotes:  212

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.282 seconds