Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1504026
 


 



The Misunderstood Contract Per Verba De Praesenti


Rebecca Probert


University of Warwick - School of Law


Probert, R., MARRIAGE LAW AND PRACTICE IN THE LONG PRACTICE IN THE LONG EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A REASSESSMENT, Chapter Two, CUP, 2009
Warwick School of Law Research

Abstract:     
For almost two hundred years it has been accepted that an exchange of vows in words of the present tense – per verba de praesenti – constituted a marriage that was valid for all purposes in England and Wales before the Clandestine Marriages Act of 1753. This chapter shows that this was not the case, and that the mistaken belief in the validity of a contract per verba de praesenti can be traced to a nineteenth-century misunderstanding, following the decision of the Supreme Court of New York court in Fenton v Reed. This argument is substantiated and proven by examining contemporary cases, legal commentaries, Parliamentary debates and fiction.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 65

Keywords: common law marriage, ecclesiastical law, clandestine marriages

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 14, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Probert, Rebecca, The Misunderstood Contract Per Verba De Praesenti. Probert, R., MARRIAGE LAW AND PRACTICE IN THE LONG PRACTICE IN THE LONG EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A REASSESSMENT, Chapter Two, CUP, 2009 ; Warwick School of Law Research. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1504026

Contact Information

Rebecca Probert (Contact Author)
University of Warwick - School of Law ( email )
Gibbet Hill Road
Coventry CV4 7AL, CV4 7AL
United Kingdom
02476 524484 (Phone)
02476 524105 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/staff/academic/probert

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,343
Downloads: 398
Download Rank: 41,887

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds