Best Practices on ‘Best Practices’: Legal Education and Beyond
Ira P. Robbins
American University - Washington College of Law
Clinical Law Review, Vol. 16, p. 269, 2009
American University, WCL Research Paper No. 09-38
NYLS Clinical Research Institute Paper No. 09/10 #9
“Best practices” has become one of the most common research and development techniques in the United States and throughout the international community. Originally employed in industry, the concept sought to identify superior means to achieve a goal through “benchmarking,” thereby allowing companies to obtain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. In recent decades, the use of best practices has become widely popularized, and is frequently utilized in the areas of administrative regulation, corporate governance, and academia. As the term has grown in popularity, however, so too has room for its abuse. In many instances, the term has been invoked to claim unsupported superiority in a given field.
This article examines the history behind the emergence of best practices, summarizes the prevailing models of the concept, surveys the worst practices on best practices, and proposes a working definition. It then applies that definition to the Clinical Legal Education Association publication, Best Practices for Legal Education. While there are contexts in which identifying and applying best practices may be appropriate, the article concludes that using best practices when thinking and writing about legal education is misleading and inappropriate.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 39
Keywords: best practices, benchmarking, minimum standards, baselines, legal education, legal education reform, industry, competitive advantage, administrative regulation, corporate governance, Carnegie Report, MacCrate Report, goals of legal education, case method, clinical legal education, law reform
JEL Classification: D23, D24, D60, D61, D81, E00, H00, I20, I21, K00, K10, K20, K23, K29, L11, L15, L80, M11, O20, O21,
Date posted: November 14, 2009 ; Last revised: December 1, 2009
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.156 seconds