Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1505633
 
 

Footnotes (157)



 


 



Formalism and Realism in Ruins (Mapping the Logic of Collapse)


Pierre Schlag


University of Colorado Law School

November 13, 2009

U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-20
Iowa Law Review, Vol. 95, p. 195, 2009

Abstract:     
After laying out a conventional account of the formalism vs. realism debates, this Article argues that formalism and realism are at once impossible and entrenched. To say they are impossible is to say that they are not as represented - that they cannot deliver their promised goods. To say that they are entrenched is to say that these forms of thought are sedimented as thought and practice throughout law’s empire. We live thus amidst the ruins of formalism and realism. The disputes between these two great determinations of American law continue today, but usually in more localized or circumscribed forms. We see versions of the disputes, for instance, in the stylized disagreements over the desired form of judicial doctrines (rules vs. standards); or the best rendition of key political values like equality (formal vs. substantive); or the proper mode of judicial interpretation (textual vs. purposive). Here too the arguments that comprise the localized variants of the dispute remain inconclusive.

The Article concludes by mapping “the logics of collapse” - specifically, some critical moves that undermine the rhetorical and intellectual force of the formalism vs. realism disputes and their localized variants. The aims here are several. First, the ability to deploy the critical moves helps with analysis. The critical moves help show how the arguments are constructed in the first place and how they are rhetorically and intellectually compromised. Second, and relatedly, the critical moves allow us to avoid being taken in by the formalism vs. realism arguments and their localized variants. Third, the aim is to show how our formalist and realist argumentation has already been surpassed by a legal “logic” that undermines the cogency of that argumentation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: formalism, legal formalism, realism, legal realism, jurisprudence, textualism, purposivism, rhetoric, aesthetics

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 16, 2009 ; Last revised: March 4, 2010

Suggested Citation

Schlag, Pierre, Formalism and Realism in Ruins (Mapping the Logic of Collapse) (November 13, 2009). U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-20; Iowa Law Review, Vol. 95, p. 195, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1505633

Contact Information

Pierre Schlag (Contact Author)
University of Colorado Law School ( email )
Campus Box 401
Boulder, CO 80309
United States
303-492-3110 (Phone)
303-492-1200 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 986
Downloads: 227
Download Rank: 78,392
Footnotes:  157

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.312 seconds