Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1507344
 
 

Footnotes (168)



 


 



Reading Ricci: Whitening Discrimination, Racing Test Fairness


Cheryl I. Harris


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Kimberly West-Faulcon


Loyola Law School Los Angeles

November 16, 2009

UCLA Law Review, Vol. 58, p. 73, 2010
Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2009-49
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 09-30

Abstract:     
This Article posits that the Supreme Court's decision in Ricci v. DeStefano does not evaluate all claims of discrimination on a level playing field but rather "whitens" discrimination and "races" test fairness. The authors explicate how Ricci whitens discrimination by reframing antidiscrimination law's presumptions and burdens to focus on disparate treatment of whites as the paradigmatic and ultimately preferred claim; Ricci races test fairness by finding that efforts to use of job-related assessment tools that correct racial imbalance and better measure merit constitute racially disparate treatment of whites. Under Ricci all forms of racial attentivenes - like attending to the racial impact of promotional exams - become racial discrimination. This conflation derives in part from the application of the colorblindness/race-consciousness dyad, which obscures the more finely grained distinctions between racial attentiveness and inattentiveness that better parse the question of whether, in a given circumstance, taking account of race constitutes race discrimination. Contrary to Ricci's presumptions, not all racially attentive conduct is discriminatory; nor is all racially inattentive conduct nondiscriminatory. Secondly, while Ricci was framed as a reverse discrimination case, the authors evaluate it as a disparate impact claim using empirical analysis to examine the promotional lists at the heart of the Ricci lawsuit and to assess the effect of the City's failure to comply with accepted professional standards for proper test design and test use on Black and Latino firefighters and white firefighters who were not part of the Ricci plaintiff class. From this vantage point, New Haven's exams did not identify the most qualified candidates but instead unfairly and unncessarily reproduced the fire department's racially skewed status quo. Nevertheless, in Ricci, the City's efforts to ameliorate this racial imbalance were themselves treated as attempts to racially rig results, exemplifying how the pursuit of fair testing was raced. The Article concludes by evaluating proposals geared towards rectifying Ricci's dilution of Title VII disparate impact law, situating these alternatives in the broader context of the agenda to prevent the conversion of antidiscrimination law into discrimination itself.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 93

Keywords: Discrimination, Race, Disparate impact, Testing, Title VII

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 16, 2009 ; Last revised: January 2, 2011

Suggested Citation

Harris, Cheryl I. and West-Faulcon, Kimberly, Reading Ricci: Whitening Discrimination, Racing Test Fairness (November 16, 2009). UCLA Law Review, Vol. 58, p. 73, 2010; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2009-49; UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 09-30. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1507344

Contact Information

Cheryl I. Harris (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
Kimberly West-Faulcon
Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
213-736-8172 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,443
Downloads: 342
Download Rank: 48,491
Footnotes:  168

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds