Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1508041
 
 

References (3)



 


 



Comparison of Historical and Parametric Value-at-Risk Methodologies


Péter Dobránszky


BNP Paribas, Risk - Investment & Markets; Catholic University of Leuven (KUL), Department of Mathematics

September 24, 2009


Abstract:     
Should we apply historical or parametric Value-at-Risk (VaR) methodologies? In this note, we address some differences between the historical and parametric VaR methodologies. In the light of the recent crisis and turmoil on financial markets we look for advantages and disadvantages of the methodologies. This note is not targeted to give a broad analysis comparing all aspects of historical and parametric VaR methodologies, it intends to give only some thoughts instead that came into the minds when talking about different VaR methodologies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Keywords: Value-at-Risk, historical VaR, parametric VaR, filtering procedures, normalization, Monte-Carlo simulations, asset price dynamics

JEL Classification: G12, G22, G24, C15, D81

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 18, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Dobránszky, Péter, Comparison of Historical and Parametric Value-at-Risk Methodologies (September 24, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1508041 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1508041

Contact Information

Péter Dobránszky (Contact Author)
BNP Paribas, Risk - Investment & Markets ( email )
Montagne Du Parc 3
Brussels, 1000
Belgium
Catholic University of Leuven (KUL), Department of Mathematics ( email )
Celestijnenlaan 200 B
Leuven, 3001
Belgium
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,842
Downloads: 838
Download Rank: 14,640
References:  3

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.406 seconds