Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1509452
 
 

References (25)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



The Effect of Rules Shifting Supreme Court Jurisdiction from Mandatory to Discretionary — An Empirical Lesson from Taiwan


Theodore Eisenberg


Cornell University - Law School

Kuo‐Chang Huang


Institutum Iurisprudentiae

November 19, 2009

Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1509452

Abstract:     
Theoretical works suggest that granting a supreme court discretion in choosing the cases to be decided on the merits could shift dockets away from traditional case-based adjudication and towards issue-based adjudication. According to this prediction, legislatures can recast supreme courts’ roles in society by modifying jurisdictional rules. This study tests this prediction empirically. Using a newly assembled data set on appeals terminated by the Taiwan Supreme Court for the period 1996-2008, we study the effect of jurisdictional-source procedural reform, a switch from mandatory jurisdiction to discretionary jurisdiction in 2003, on the Taiwan Supreme Court’s performance. Our study shows that the 2003 reform failed to transform the function of the Court from correcting error to a greater role in leading the development of legal doctrine as intended by the legislature. Our findings suggest that a supreme court can adjust the way it conducts business according to its own preference and the role it defines for itself, which are influenced both by the background against which it operates and the inertia of its members’ working habits. Our study informs policy-makers that merely amending procedural rules, without more, is unlikely to change the function of a supreme court. Our findings also suggest that statutorily dictated mandatory jurisdiction may not be implemented by a high court faced with caseload pressure.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: Courts, Jursidiction, Appeals

JEL Classification: K10, K40, K41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 21, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Eisenberg, Theodore and Huang, Kuo‐Chang, The Effect of Rules Shifting Supreme Court Jurisdiction from Mandatory to Discretionary — An Empirical Lesson from Taiwan (November 19, 2009). Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1509452. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1509452 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1509452

Contact Information

Theodore Eisenberg (Contact Author)
Cornell University - Law School ( email )
524 College Ave
Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-6477 (Phone)
607-255-7193 (Fax)
Kuo-Chang Huang
Institutum Iurisprudentiae ( email )
Nankang
Taipei, 11529
Taiwan
886-2-26525419 (Phone)
886-2-27859471 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 743
Downloads: 92
Download Rank: 166,721
References:  25
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.703 seconds