|
||||
|
||||
General Anti-Avoidance Rules and Double Tax Agreements: A New Zealand PerspectiveJohn PrebbleVictoria University of Wellington; Institut für Österreichisches und Internationales Steuerrecht, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien; Monash University Craig ElliffeUniversity of Auckland; University of Auckland - Faculty of Business & Economics November 19, 2009 Revenue Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, Article 4, 2009 Abstract: This article looks at the effectiveness, in the New Zealand context, of the application of a general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) when the impugned transaction or arrangement is cross-border. The important issue is how the provisions of a double tax agreement have application to the transaction or arrangement when the GAAR is invoked by the revenue authorities. In many countries, tax treaties prevail over domestic tax laws in the event of a conflict. Some countries provide expressly that their GAAR will apply to their treaties.The question is whether this is true for New Zealand, and whether there is anything peculiar in the New Zealand statutory scheme that gives guidance on whether tax treaties preclude or limit the application of the GAAR.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16 Keywords: general anti-avoidance, double tax agreements, cross border transactions JEL Classification: K33, K34 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: November 22, 2009 ; Last revised: July 11, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.562 seconds