Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1514126
 
 

Footnotes (1)



 


 



Tort Litigation Between Spouses: Let's Meet Somewhere in the Middle


Benjamin Shmueli


Bar-Ilan University - Faculty of Law; Yale Law School; Sha'arei Mishpat College; Visiting Professor - Duke Law School

November 26, 2009

Harvard Negotiation Law Review, Vol. 15, pp. 201-265, 2010

Abstract:     
In the past, and, to a certain extent, even at present, immunities existed in common law against tort litigation within the family. Is it appropriate today to block such claims, or should they be considered in the same way as any other tort suit? The present essay will address this question, by examining the possibility of establishing a delicate balance between the individualistic approach, which focuses on realizing the autonomy of the individual to sue for harm done to him, and the family-collectivist approach, which attempts to determine what is best for the family as a whole, and is concerned that legal intervention in its affairs may be more detrimental than beneficial.

The assumption in this essay will be that, although we are talking of a claim under tort law, rather than under family law, and that this claim may be consistent with the goals of tort law, one cannot ignore the fact that this is not a suit involving two strangers. Moreover, since these are particularly charged, emotional claims, the real remedy desired may at times not be financial compensation at all, but some other remedy, an emotional one, which the law cannot provide, but which might be provided specifically through extrajudicial proceedings. But requiring the parties to take part in such a proceeding under the auspices of the court (e.g. mandatory mediation) is itself problematic, since these are essentially voluntary proceedings.

I will propose a desirable model that balances the two approaches, the individualistic and the family. This model will present a theoretical and practical framework for hearing such claims, applicable to the different stages of tort proceedings in the courts, while also making use, in the framework of such proceedings, of quasi-mandatory extrajudicial processes.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 27, 2009 ; Last revised: June 27, 2010

Suggested Citation

Shmueli, Benjamin, Tort Litigation Between Spouses: Let's Meet Somewhere in the Middle (November 26, 2009). Harvard Negotiation Law Review, Vol. 15, pp. 201-265, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1514126

Contact Information

Benjamin Shmueli (Contact Author)
Bar-Ilan University - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law
Ramat Gan, 52900
Israel
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.biu.ac.il/en/node/455#tabs-tabset-5
Yale Law School ( email )
127 Wall St.
New Haven, CT 06511
United States
Sha'arei Mishpat College ( email )
1 Aliat Ha'Noar St.
Hod Hasharon, 45101
Israel
HOME PAGE: http://www.mishpat.ac.il/main.asp?lngCategoryID=4314
Visiting Professor - Duke Law School
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.duke.edu/fac/shmueli/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 653
Downloads: 93
Download Rank: 170,922
Footnotes:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.625 seconds