The Legal Profession's Failure to Discipline Unethical Prosecutors
Angela J. Davis
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 36, No. 275, 2007
This article explores the legal profession's failure to hold prosecutors accountable for misconduct and other ethical violations. Part I introduces the piece, providing several examples of prosecutorial power and abuse in the criminal justice system. Part II discusses prosecutorial misconduct and the inadequacy of current legal remedies. Part III argues that the Model Rules of Professional Responsibility have not provided adequate guidance to prosecutors, and that the disciplinary process has not been effective in disciplining prosecutors when they have abused their power and discretion. Part IV contends that the disbarment of Mike Nifong – the prosecutor in the Duke lacrosse case – was an aberration and that race and class issues influenced the outcome. Part V suggests that the Rules should be amended to include other forms of prosecutorial abuse, using the Genarlow Wilson and Jena Six cases as examples. Part VI proposes measures for reform, including strengthening the disciplinary process and completing the work of the ABA Ethics 2000 Commission.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29
Keywords: Jena Six, Genarlow Wilson, Prosecutorial Abuse, Prosecutorial Power, ABA Ethics Commission, Legal Ethics, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Prosecutor, Model Rules of Professional ResponsibilityAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 2, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.313 seconds