Abstract

 
 

Citations (4)



 


 



Prosecution and Race: The Power and Privilege of Discretion


Angela J. Davis


affiliation not provided to SSRN

October 1, 1998

Fordham Law Review, Vol. 67, No. 13, 1998

Abstract:     
This article examines prosecutorial discretion and argues it is a major cause of racial inequality in the criminal justice system. It asserts that prosecutorial discretion may instead be used to construct effective solutions to racial injustice. The article maintains that since prosecutors have more power than any other criminal justice officials, with practically no corresponding accountability to the public they serve, they have the responsibility to use their discretion to help eradicate the discriminatory treatment of African Americans in the criminal justice system.

Part I of the Article explains the importance and impact of the prosecution function. Part II discusses the role of race and racism in discretionary prosecutorial decisions. Part III examines the difficulty in bringing successful legal challenges to discriminatory prosecutorial decisions. Part IV suggests the use of prosecutorial discretion as a remedy for race discrimination in the criminal justice system. Finally, Part V proposes the use of racial impact studies in prosecution offices to advance the responsible, nondiscriminatory exercise of prosecutorial discretion.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: Criminal justice, racial justice, criminal defense, prosecutorial misconduct, race discrimination, prosecutorial power, racial inequality

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 2, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Davis, Angela J., Prosecution and Race: The Power and Privilege of Discretion (October 1, 1998). Fordham Law Review, Vol. 67, No. 13, 1998. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1516010

Contact Information

Angela J. Davis (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 953
Downloads: 227
Download Rank: 65,558
Citations:  4

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.547 seconds