Abstract

 
 

References (57)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



An Information Gap in DNA Evidence Interpretation


Mark W. Perlin


Cybergenetics

Alexander Sinelnikov


Genetica

May 8, 2009


Abstract:     
Forensic DNA evidence often contains mixtures of multiple contributors, or is present in low copy numbers. The resulting data signals may appear to be relatively uninformative when interpreted using qualitative inclusion-based methods. However, these same data can yield greater identification information when interpreted by computer using quantitative data- modeling methods. This study applies both qualitative and quantitative interpretation methods to a well-characterized DNA mixture and dilution data set, and compares the inferred match information. The results show that qualitative interpretation loses identification power at low culprit DNA quantities (below 100 pg), but that quantitative methods produce useful information down into the 10 pg range. Thus there is a ten-fold information gap that separates the qualitative and quantitative DNA mixture interpretation approaches. With low quantities of culprit DNA (10 pg to 100 pg), computer-based quantitative interpretation provides greater match sensitivity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: forensics, DNA, mixture, match, genotype

JEL Classification: C11, C63, D81, H41, K14, O33

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 1, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Perlin, Mark W. and Sinelnikov, Alexander, An Information Gap in DNA Evidence Interpretation (May 8, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1516366 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1516366

Contact Information

Mark W. Perlin (Contact Author)
Cybergenetics ( email )
160 North Craig Street
Suite 210
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
United States
412.683.3004 (Phone)
412.683.3005 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.cybgen.com
Alexander Sinelnikov
Genetica ( email )
Cincinnati, OH
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 216
Downloads: 36
References:  57
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.453 seconds