Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1516389
 
 

Footnotes (97)



 


 



Fighting Freestyle: The First Amendment, Fairness and Corporate Reputation


Rebecca Tushnet


Georgetown University Law Center

December 1, 2009

Boston College Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 1, p. 1457, 2009
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 1516389

Abstract:     
There are three distinct groups who might want to engage in speech about commercial entities or to constrain those commercial entities from making particular claims of their own. Competitors may sue each other for false advertising, consumers may sue businesses, and government regulators may impose requirements on what businesses must and may not say. In this context, this Article will evaluate a facially persuasive but ultimately misguided claim about corporate speech: that because consumers regularly get to say nasty things about corporations under the lax standards governing defamation of public figures, corporations must be free to make factual claims subject only to defamation-type restrictions on intentionally false statements. The premise that this would further equality ignores the overall structure of advertising law, in which consumers cannot be equated to advertisers, competitors are already on equal footing with one another, and the government as regulator is not supposed to be on equal footing with anyone.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: first amendment, commercial speech, Nike v. Kasky

JEL Classification: M37, K22, D12, D18

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 1, 2009 ; Last revised: April 3, 2014

Suggested Citation

Tushnet, Rebecca, Fighting Freestyle: The First Amendment, Fairness and Corporate Reputation (December 1, 2009). Boston College Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 1, p. 1457, 2009; Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 1516389. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1516389

Contact Information

Rebecca Tushnet (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 350
Downloads: 52
Download Rank: 231,472
Footnotes:  97

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.453 seconds