Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1516667
 
 

Footnotes (290)



 


 



Privileges, Immunities, and Substantive Due Process


Timothy Sandefur


Pacific Legal Foundation

December 1, 2009

NYU Journal of Law & Liberty, Vol. 5, No. 1

Abstract:     
In McDonald v. Chicago, the Supreme Court is being asked to reconsider its disastrous 1873 decision in The Slaughter-House Cases. This article seeks to discuss Slaughter-House in a broader context, to address two questions. First, what is the fundamental reason that Slaughter-House was wrongly decided? Although the decision has many flaws, I contend that the deepest reason, and the one that accounts for the case’s other errors, involves important abstract principles of federalism and sovereignty; in particular, the Slaughter-House Court failed to give effect to the principle of "paramount national citizenship" that was a component of Republican Party ideology and the most fundamental.

Second, is it true, as some scholars and judges contend, that overruling Slaughter-House and restoring vitality to the privileges or immunities clause would warrant abandoning the theory of "substantive due process"? If so, then the McDonald decision could herald an even more far-reaching revolution of law than it would at first appear. But in fact, "substantive due process" is not a mere substitute for the lost privileges or immunities clause, and overruling Slaughter-House should not coincide with an abandonment of theat theory. Rather, both doctrines are independent, constitutionally valid sources of protection against excessive state power.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: Slaughterhouse Cases, Slaughter-House Cases, Slaughter House Cases, McDonald v. Chicago, privileges or immunities, privileges and immunities, sovereignty, federalism, fundamental rights, liberal originalism

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 2, 2009 ; Last revised: June 14, 2010

Suggested Citation

Sandefur, Timothy, Privileges, Immunities, and Substantive Due Process (December 1, 2009). NYU Journal of Law & Liberty, Vol. 5, No. 1. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1516667

Contact Information

Timothy Sandefur (Contact Author)
Pacific Legal Foundation ( email )
930 G Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,337
Downloads: 403
Download Rank: 40,360
Footnotes:  290

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds