Abstract

 
 

References (21)



 


 



Separate Cash Flow Evaluations - Applications to Investment Decisions and Tax Design


Petter Osmundsen


CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research)

Magne Emhjellen


Petoro A.S.

December 2, 2009

USAEE (U.S. Association of Energy Economics) WP 09-026

Abstract:     
Oil project assessment using separate cashflow valuation (Jacoby and Laughton, 1992, Laughton and Jacoby, 1993 and Emhjellen, 1999), presume that the present value of the cost cashflow of oil projects can be calculated using a risk free rate. This paper examines whether this practice, at least to a first approximation, is reasonable. More specifically, the paper examines whether labour wage hours costs and steel prices, as cost factors in the investment cost stream, are systematic cost factors (i.e. have a beta different from zero). The paper also investigates whether oil price as a factor in the revenue stream is a systematic revenue factor. Separate cash flow evaluation has been discussed in relation to petroleum taxation. A petroleum tax commission in Norway stated that tax reductions due to depreciation should separately be discounted by a risk free rate. We discuss the role of partial cash flow discounting in tax design.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 6, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Osmundsen, Petter and Emhjellen, Magne, Separate Cash Flow Evaluations - Applications to Investment Decisions and Tax Design (December 2, 2009). USAEE (U.S. Association of Energy Economics) WP 09-026. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1517182 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1517182

Contact Information

Petter Osmundsen (Contact Author)
CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research) ( email )
Poschinger Str. 5
Munich, DE-81679
Germany
Magne Emhjellen
Petoro A.S. ( email )
Norway
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 315
Downloads: 69
Download Rank: 170,445
References:  21

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.313 seconds