Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1517846
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (489)



 


 



Debunking the 'End of History' Thesis for Corporate Law


Leonard I. Rotman


Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University

December 3, 2009

Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 33, No. 2, p. 219, 2010

Abstract:     
In their article, “The End of History for Corporate Law,” Henry Hansmann and Reinier Kraakman proclaimed the triumph of the shareholder primacy norm over competing progressive theories of the corporation. This Article debunks Hansmann and Kraakman’s “end of history” thesis on both U.S. and Canadian corporate law grounds. A critical examination of high-profile U.S. corporate law jurisprudence indicates that the shareholder primacy norm cannot be supported, even by cases such as Dodge v. Ford and Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., which exist at the foundation of shareholder primacy arguments. Further, Canadian corporate law jurisprudence and the structure of Canadian corporate law statutes reveal the complete lack of support for shareholder primacy arguments north of the forty-ninth parallel, further impeding Hansmann and Kraakman’s claim. This state of affairs demonstrates that Hansmann and Kraakman’s “end of history” thesis is, at best, premature and, at worst, incorrect.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: Corporate Law, Corporate Governance, Shareholder Primacy, Progressive Corporate Law

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 4, 2009 ; Last revised: August 5, 2011

Suggested Citation

Rotman, Leonard I., Debunking the 'End of History' Thesis for Corporate Law (December 3, 2009). Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 33, No. 2, p. 219, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1517846

Contact Information

Leonard I. Rotman (Contact Author)
Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University ( email )
6061 University Avenue
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4H9
Canada
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,119
Downloads: 458
Download Rank: 35,481
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  489

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds