|
||||
|
||||
Should Rapid Tests for HIV Infection Now Be Mandatory During Pregnancy? Global Differences in Scarcity and a Dilemma of Technological AdvanceCharles B. SmithUniversity of Utah Margaret Pabst BattinUniversity of Utah - Department of Philosophy Jay A. JacobsonUniversity of Utah - School of Medicine Leslie P. FrancisUniversity of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law December 7, 2009 Developing World Bioethics, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 86-103, 2007 Abstract: Rapid tests for HIV can now provide real-time assessment of the HIV status of pregnant women presenting inactive labor. They thus provide important information about the need for prophylactic treatment to reduce the likelihood of disease transmission during delivery. Although the need for treatment to protect the child is a strong argument for mandatory testing, in this article we contend that the ethical situation is more complex. The availability of treatment for the HIV woman herself and the possibility that knowledge of her HIV status might put her in physical or economic jeopardy are especially important factors that must weigh in the balance of any decision to mandate rapid testing.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: December 8, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.359 seconds