The Wrongheaded and Dangerous Campaign to Criminalize Good Faith Legal Advice
Hofstra University - School of Law
December 8, 2009
Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 42, p. 449, 2009
Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-27
I argue in this brief essay that the increasingly fervent insistence on criminal punishment of the Bush administration lawyers for their legal advice on interrogation policy is both wrong-headed and dangerous. It is wrong-headed because the insistence on criminal prosecution of attorneys based solely upon their good faith interpretation of the law is highly unlikely to succeed as a matter of both U.S. and international law. It is dangerous because, at least with respect to U.S. law, prosecuting good faith legal advice is (and should be) a violation of those attorneys’ constitutional rights under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment and broader norms of free expression. Insisting on prosecuting lawyers for their good-faith legal advice, or even threatening prosecution, will chill the ability of future government lawyers to give legal advice on complex and important questions implicating U.S. national security.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 11
Keywords: constitutional law, international law
JEL Classification: K33Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 8, 2009 ; Last revised: January 9, 2010
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.344 seconds