Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1520788
 
 

Footnotes (12)



 


 



Poisoned Chalice? A Critical Analysis of the Evidence Linking Personal Injury Compensation Processes with Adverse Health Outcomes


Genevieve Grant


Monash University - Faculty of Law

David M. Studdert


University of Melbourne - Faculty of Law & Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences

December 8, 2009

Melbourne Univeristy Law Review, Volume 33, Issue 3, 2009
U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 442

Abstract:     
Do injured persons whose injuries are potentially eligible for compensation under social insurance schemes experience worse health outcomes and slower recoveries in the medium-to long-term than persons with similar injuries that are not covered by compensation schemes? Epidemiologists and health services researchers have probed that question since the 1970s, but interest in it has accelerated sharply in the last decade. A substantial empirical literature now exists to support the existence of a link between compensation status and health outcomes. A strand of that literature specifically implicates the role of compensation processes, lawyers and adversarialism in producing or perpetuating ill health among claimants.

This article critically reviews research into the compensation-health relationship. Systematic methodological weaknesses are identified – in particular, an inability to come to grips with the legal contours and realities of compensation processes. We conclude that, although there are important gaps in the evidence, profound questions about the impact of compensation processes on claimants’ health have been placed on the table. Legal professionals and policymakers must take these questions seriously. The involvement of legal scholars in multidisciplinary research may improve the quality of the evidence base and facilitate appropriate policy interventions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: health compensation, insurance, injury claims

JEL Classification: K00, K39, K49, I18, I19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 11, 2009 ; Last revised: August 25, 2010

Suggested Citation

Grant, Genevieve and Studdert, David M., Poisoned Chalice? A Critical Analysis of the Evidence Linking Personal Injury Compensation Processes with Adverse Health Outcomes (December 8, 2009). Melbourne Univeristy Law Review, Volume 33, Issue 3, 2009; U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 442. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1520788

Contact Information

Genevieve M. Grant (Contact Author)
Monash University - Faculty of Law ( email )
Wellington Road
Clayton, Victoria 3800
Australia

David M. Studdert
University of Melbourne - Faculty of Law & Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences ( email )
Melbourne, Victoria 3010
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,740
Downloads: 154
Download Rank: 112,474
Footnotes:  12

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.360 seconds