The Humane Principle and the Biology of Blame: Evolutionary Origins of the Imperative to Inflict
John A. Humbach
Pace University School of Law
December 16, 2009
Proceedings of Global Conference on Perspectives on Evil and Human Wickedness
The idea that some people "deserve" to suffer has enormous social implications. People insist there is a moral right to cause human suffering. However, as the circle of humans deemed entitled to full human dignity grows wider, the next logical step is to adopt a general principle that any deliberate increase in human suffering is wrong, without exception Such a Humane Principle, to replace the old principle of "just deserts," might be provisionally formulated as follows: "Any act to cause human suffering is wrong and must be avoided unless it is honestly meant as the most humane alternative that the situation presents, according equal concern to all who are affected." Resistance to such a principle is considerable because, unfortunately, people draw unwarranted moral conclusions from their feelings of blame. But these feelings are merely adaptations to conditions that have long ceased to apply. Causing deliberate harm to others has ceased to be either a socially adaptive or morally defensible mode of social control.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18
Keywords: blame, Humane Principle, evolution of morals, evolutionary psychology, evolving appetites for violence, legitimacy of violence, retribution, upward moral trajectory, just deserts
Date posted: December 20, 2009 ; Last revised: March 21, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.281 seconds