Criminal Alternative Dispute Resolution: Restoring Justice, Respecting Responsibility, and Renewing Public Norms

Vermont Law Review, Vol. 34, 2010

34 Pages Posted: 20 Dec 2009 Last revised: 15 May 2010

See all articles by Maggie T. Grace

Maggie T. Grace

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law

Date Written: December 17, 2009

Abstract

This Article explores theoretical concerns underlying contemporary appeals to Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") in the criminal justice system. Analyzing literature on free will and responsibility and leading work on transitional justice, I argue that a restorative justice approach to criminal ADR better accommodates the realities of social conditions that correlate with criminality while respecting deeply-held concepts of responsibility. I further argue that this approach provides a useful response to critics, such as Owen Fiss, who argue that ADR privatizes disputes, thereby failing to produce and reinforce essential public norms.

Keywords: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Justice, Punishment, Sentencing, Jurisprudence

Suggested Citation

Grace, Maggie T., Criminal Alternative Dispute Resolution: Restoring Justice, Respecting Responsibility, and Renewing Public Norms (December 17, 2009). Vermont Law Review, Vol. 34, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1524762

Maggie T. Grace (Contact Author)

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law ( email )

500 West Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201-1786
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,144
Abstract Views
4,135
Rank
34,704
PlumX Metrics