|
||||
|
||||
The Price of Pay to Play in Securities Class ActionsStephen J. ChoiNew York University School of Law Drew T. Johnson-SkinnerNew York University School of Law Adam C. PritchardUniversity of Michigan Law School July 7, 2011 U of Michigan Law & Econ, Empirical Legal Studies Center Paper No. 09-025 5th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Forthcoming Abstract: This paper studies the effect of campaign contributions to lead plaintiffs — “pay to play’’— on the level of attorneys’ fees in securities class actions. We find that state pension funds generally pay lower attorneys’ fees when they serve as lead plaintiffs in securities class actions than do individual investors serving in that capacity, and larger funds negotiate for lower fees. This differential disappears, however, when we control for campaign contributions made to officials with influence over state pension funds. This effect is most pronounced when we focus on state pension funds that receive the largest campaign contributions and that associate repeatedly as lead plaintiff with a single plaintiffs’ attorney firm. Thus, pay to play appears to increase agency costs borne by shareholders in securities class actions, undermining one of Congress’s principal goals in adopting the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 35 Keywords: securities class action, attorney fees, plaintiffs' attorneys, pension funds Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: December 27, 2009 ; Last revised: July 8, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.860 seconds