The ECJ and the ECtHR: The Future Relationship between the Two European Courts
University of Edinburgh School of Law
June 30, 2009
The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, Vol. 8, pp. 375–398, 2009
The current relationship between the two European courts has been discussed in some great detail while the future of that relationship has been widely neglected. This is somewhat surprising as the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty and with it of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as well as the EU’s succession to the ECHR are probably going to take place before too long. The article first examines Article 52(3) of the Charter, which prescribes that the ECHR be the minimum standard of human rights in the EU. It is argued that Article 52 (3) does not entail a reference to the ECtHR’s case law so that the ECJ will not be bound by that case law. After an accession of the EU to the ECHR, it is likely that both courts will assert that they have exclusive jurisdiction over the ECHR in inter-state cases, which creates a jurisdictional conflict for which a solution must be found. In addition, the article explores whether after an accession, the Bosphorus case law will have a future and whether the dictum found in Opinion 1/91 will be applicable, according to which the ECJ is bound by the decisions of courts created by an international agreement to which the EC is a party.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: ECJ, ECtHR, EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, ECHR accession, Bosphorus case, exclusive jurisdiction, jurisdictional conflictAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 24, 2009 ; Last revised: September 30, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.344 seconds