Legal Authority to Regulate Smoking and Common Threats and Challenges: 2009
affiliation not provided to SSRN
William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-03
Smoke-free policies continue to be the most effective and economic strategy for protecting nonsmokers from exposure to secondhand smoke. As of April 2009, 16,519 municipalities across the United States have passed a state or local law with a 100 percent smoke-free provision covering workplaces, and/or restaurants, and/or bars, and protecting 70.2 percent of the United States population. A small number of these laws have been legally challenged. Although most of these challenges have been unsuccessful, smoke-free litigation can be an exhausting, expensive and time-consuming process. The best way for policymakers and smoke-free advocates to avoid litigation is to learn from past experience.
This law synopsis serves as a primer on common legal threats and challenges to smoke-free regulation. It reviews state and local governmental authority for regulating smoking, and briefly outlines the legal doctrine of preemption. It describes several constitutional legal challenges to smoke-free ordinances, such as claims brought on the basis of equal protection, vagueness, privacy, takings, freedom of association, and freedom of speech. The synopsis also examines the legal authority of local regulatory bodies to pass smoke-free ordinances. Finally, it uses the example of private clubs to illustrate the need for care when drafting smoke-free ordinances.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23
Keywords: Tobacco, law, policy, public health, smoking, smoke-free, secondhand smoke, tobacco, tobacco regulation, smoking banworking papers series
Date posted: December 27, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds