Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1527871
 


 



Criminal Misconduct: Ethical Rule Usage Leads to Regulation of the Legal Profession


Ellen S. Podgor


Stetson University College of Law

December 24, 1988

Temple Law Review, Vol. 61, 1988

Abstract:     
This article examines the evolution of ethical rules for lawyers and judges, and considers the various forums in which these rules have appeared. The article centers upon the use of these rules in the context of a criminal trial of an attorney or judge and discusses the court's preliminary finding of materiality and/or relevance of the ethical rules to the issues of the criminal trial. In those cases in which the courts have found ethical rules admissible as evidence or as a jury instruction, they are admitted as either a "rule of law' or as a "guidance." The distinction between these two roles is studied, as well as the prejudicial effect of admitting the rules. Finally, the article reflects upon the harms which accrue by the admission of these ethical rules, and the remedies available to curtail future application of these ethical rules in criminal trials of judges or attorneys.

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: December 26, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Podgor, Ellen S., Criminal Misconduct: Ethical Rule Usage Leads to Regulation of the Legal Profession (December 24, 1988). Temple Law Review, Vol. 61, 1988. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1527871

Contact Information

Ellen S. Podgor (Contact Author)
Stetson University College of Law ( email )
1401 61st Street South
Gulfport, FL 33707
United States
727 562 7348 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.stetson.edu/tmpl/faculty/memberProfile.aspx?id=88

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 188

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.454 seconds