Courthouse, Statehouse, or Both? Redefining Institutional Roles in School Finance Reform
Christopher A. Suarez
Yale University - Law School
January 2, 2010
Yale Law & Policy Review, Volume 28, Issue 2
This Review discusses two new books that build upon the existing literature discussing remedies in school finance litigation. Both books - Courts and Kids (Rebell) and Schoolhouses, Courthouses, Statehouses (Hanushek and Lindseth) - make significant contributions to this literature. Hanushek and Lindseth are pessimistic about the role of courts in school finance reform, but are optimistic that school finance systems that hold school districts accountable for outcomes will provide a strong impetus for future legislative reform efforts across the nation. Rebell is less optimistic about legislatures and sees a broader role for courts, but he is confident that legislative solutions will only be effective if they are guided by a court’s use of both strong remedial principles and oversight. To harmonize the books' proposals, I propose a framework that leverages the strengths of both judicial and legislative oversight of school finance remedies.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 11
Keywords: Education, School Finance Litigation, Institutional Competence, Accountability, RemediesAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 2, 2010 ; Last revised: September 17, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.609 seconds