Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1531888
 
 

Footnotes (513)



 


 



Mapped Out of Local Democracy


Michelle Wilde Anderson


Thelton E. Henderson Center for Social Justice at Berkeley Law School

April 2010

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 931-1004, 2010
UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 1531888

Abstract:     
In the novel Sula, Toni Morrison describes a neighborhood known locally as the Bottom, where the black community lived. It was “the hilly land, where planting was backbreaking, where the soil slid down and washed away the seeds, and where the wind lingered all through the winter.” We know such Bottoms. We have seen neighborhoods forsaken in the levees’ breach, public housing blocks gaptoothed with boarded windows, and floodplain shantytowns for farmworkers. We know of homes on land scarred by contamination or dogged by natural adversity. But across the country are Bottoms of another, less familiar type. On the outskirts of cities and incorporated suburbs across the country, hundreds of high-poverty neighborhoods of color lack rudimentary services like sewage systems, drainage, and streetlights. Integrated economically with city populations but excluded from participatory rights in city government, these unincorporated urban areas bear disproportionate numbers of landfills, municipal utility plants, and freeways that benefit urban populations but threaten local health and depress land values.

What to do with today’s lost neighborhoods? It is the late dawn of the twenty-first century, when integration is stronger and civil rights laws are weaker, when local government budgets are dwarfed by demands. Suing local governments or lobbying them, two of the most important strategies of twentieth century advocacy for social justice, have been weakened by judicial and political hostility to redistributive claims. Yet state and local government law retains malleability and promise. Laws governing the allocation of power among local agencies exert significant influence over unincorporated urban areas specifically and spatial polarization by race and class more generally.

In part a prescription for unincorporated urban areas in particular, in part an exploration of solutions for any problem of metropolitan inequality, Mapped Out of Local Democracy takes stock of today’s tools. It argues for a new priority in metropolitan law and policy: State legislative reforms to empower and reshape county governments to represent regional interests and regional logic in intergovernmental negotiations. Strengthening counties to bargain with other local agencies over matters with redistributive consequences, like annexation, can bring an interlocal perspective to critical local decisionmaking and create a promising corridor for addressing contemporary issues of urban inequality. By bringing counties - our most neglected, under-theorized layer of urban government - into sharper relief, this Article offers a new direction in state and local government law to seek progress on economic and racial polarization in America’s cities.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 75

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 6, 2010 ; Last revised: September 1, 2011

Suggested Citation

Anderson, Michelle Wilde, Mapped Out of Local Democracy (April 2010). Stanford Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 931-1004, 2010; UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 1531888. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1531888

Contact Information

Michelle Wilde Anderson (Contact Author)
Thelton E. Henderson Center for Social Justice at Berkeley Law School ( email )
215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States
510-643-3144 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 817
Downloads: 104
Download Rank: 152,541
Footnotes:  513

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.312 seconds